Product layout vs process layout5/13/2024 Override protected void Convert(TextWriter writer, LoggingEvent loggingEvent) / Write the event application name to the output It is much simpler than creating the whole layout.Ĭreate your own custom pattern converter (example below tries to get the name of the application no matter win or web): internal sealed class ApplicationNamePatternConverter : PatternLayoutConverter If there is no built-in pattern for process id in the process layout, then you can easily add it. filenames etc.) whereas layout lets you format the actual message that gets into the log. If I wan't to add this new Process ID (and maybe Process Name) to the XML message, what is the best way to do this? Should I just copy src\Layouts\XmlLayoutSchemaLog4j.cs, modify it, and let log4net know that I created this new Layout (like the SampleLayoutsApp)?Īpparently PatternString can only be used to create log names (i.e. It looks like the XmlLayoutSchemaLog4j already adds the HostNameProperty to the XML message. I see the %processid in PatternString, how do I get the same in PatternLayout? Here is my test layout: įinally, it makes sense to use the XML layout for the UDP appender. What is the difference between PatternString and PatternLayout? Why have both? From the FAQ: īut I am not sure if or how to mix and match the two (or even if this is the canonical way to do so). I do, of course, see something like that in the PatternString. However, I don't see anything for process id in PatternLayouts. I found %property for hostname, and that works great. I have a few questions about patternstrings vs patternlayouts.īecause I need to know both which machine and which process that log message came from, I want to include that in the log as well. I planned on using the UDPAppender to send all log messages to a single machine that would manage them. I am trying to create a logging solution that involves multiple processes on multiple machines.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |